Skip to main content

Piano recital, sorely amplified

 06Aug25:  I am an amateur pianist.  This is the week of Porto Pianofest!  I attended a solo piano recital yesterday and the day before, both at the University of Porto's Reitoria administration building, in the Salão Nobre and the Sala Comum.  The pianists were wonderfully skilled; they played an interesting and varied repertoire, and wrote helpful comments in the program introduction.  In each case the appreciative audience numbered around one hundred people.  I was however sorely disappointed by the fact that both performances were electronically amplified.  The first case was rather subtle, noticeable in that the beautiful Yamaha grand piano was obviously connected to electric devices, and in that the pianist's powerful Ravel and Scriabin chords were exceptionally loud (my Apple watch warned me of loud noise exposure) and rough – obviously the system could not handle the volume.  Yesterday in the Sala Comum I sat further back and noticed that the music was originating not from the piano but from the loudspeaker at the side of the room!  This performance was not as loud (read "distorted") as the previous day's performance; but it was even more disappointing.   Why should I take the trouble to attend a live performance if it is going to be disintermediated by technology?  [My headphones and Spotify (better yet, Tidal) provide better sound quality and fewer distractions, fewer talkative visitors outside the room, better air-conditioning, and a more comfortable chair.]  I value a live performance for the physical sense of a human being playing that music in that moment, in front of me, on an instrument that is little changed in 100 years or more.  It provides a vital connection to a cultural past when such performance was not only highly valued but also exclusive to that audience.  That audience a hundred years ago could experience such sound quality only in person, only in front of a skilled performer on a special instrument.  And their parents would not have even conceived of the possibility of a sound recording, let alone amplification.   What a pity that a modern audience cannot attend a concert without electronic intervention.  I hope that the Museu Romântico recitals will continue to maintain a pure acoustic experience.

 

06 de agosto de 2025: Sou pianista amador. Esta é a semana do Porto Pianofest! Ontem e anteontem assisti a recitais de piano solo, ambos na Reitoria da Universidade do Porto, no Salão Nobre e na Sala Comum. Os pianistas eram extremamente talentosos; tocaram um repertório interessante e variado e escreveram comentários úteis na introdução do programa.  Em ambos os casos, o público apreciativo era composto por cerca de cem pessoas. No entanto, fiquei muito desapontado com o facto de ambas as apresentações terem sido amplificadas eletronicamente. No primeiro caso, foi bastante subtil, perceptível pelo facto de o belo piano de cauda Yamaha estar obviamente ligado a dispositivos elétricos e de os poderosos acordes de Ravel e Scriabin do pianista serem excepcionalmente altos (o meu Apple Watch avisou-me da exposição a ruído alto) e ásperos — obviamente, o sistema não conseguia lidar com o volume.  Ontem, na Sala Comum, sentei-me mais atrás e reparei que a música não vinha do piano, mas do altifalante ao lado da sala! Esta apresentação não foi tão alta (leia-se «distorcida») como a do dia anterior, mas foi ainda mais decepcionante.   Por que me dar ao trabalho de assistir a uma apresentação ao vivo se ela vai ser desintermediada pela tecnologia? [Meus auscultadores e o Spotify (melhor ainda, o Tidal) oferecem melhor qualidade de som e menos distrações, menos visitantes tagarelas fora da sala, melhor ar-condicionado e uma cadeira mais confortável.]  Valorizo uma apresentação ao vivo pela sensação física de um ser humano tocando aquela música naquele momento, na minha frente, em um instrumento que pouco mudou em 100 anos ou mais. Ela proporciona uma conexão vital com um passado cultural em que tal apresentação não era apenas altamente valorizada, mas também exclusiva para aquele público.  Aquele público, há cem anos, só podia experimentar essa qualidade de som pessoalmente, apenas na frente de um intérprete habilidoso num instrumento especial. E os seus pais nem sequer teriam concebido a possibilidade de uma gravação de som, muito menos amplificação. Que pena que o público moderno não possa assistir a um concerto sem intervenção eletrônica. Espero que os recitais do Museu Romântico continuem a manter uma experiência acústica pura.


Traduzido com a versão gratuita do tradutor - DeepL.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fleeing Trump, Americans go to Portugal

  Fleeing Trump, Americans go into exile in Portugal. “I'm afraid to go back” Not only minorities feel threatened by the Trump administration. Three couples, a mother and an academic tell us why they chose to live in Portugal. Some say: the American dream is over.      The above is today's headline article in our favorite trusted newspaper in Portugal, O Publico .  It's a centrist newspaper, owned by a big supermarket corporation.  Let's combine this with the recent news that Portugal's Air Force is now shifting away from its planned purchase of F-35 jets.  Even though Trump has not even mentioned Portugal in his various diatribes against former allies, Portugal and the rest of Europe are reeling from the attacks.  We hope it has the ironic effect of freeing Europe from American dominance and improving the chances for centrist leadership (against Trump-like parties that have been gaining prominence).  The original text follows: Em fuga de Tru...

EUA: tanto estrago em tão pouco tempo

 As part of my effort to learn about Portugal, both the country and the language, I'm subscribing to the centrist newspaper, O Publico .  There are plenty of newspapers: conservative tabloids, and socialist and communist-sponsored daily papers; I find O Publico to be most sober, with consistently interesting columnists and opinion pieces, in addition to some local (Porto) news, with just enough sporting news to keep me chatting with the taxi driver.   Today's opinion piece sums up, I think, European pundits' view of the U.S. government.  As the title puts it: so much damage in so little time.  I shudder at the rank incompetence and corrupt behavior, demonstrating a cynical attitude toward public service, showing indeed that the cruelty is the point. What scandal, what damage will be the tipping point to collapse this government?   And what will it take to recover from the damage?  Who will be able to trust the US government again, ever?   Only ni...

Captain America dominates the news, in many ways

KoreaTimes newspaper of April 5, 2014:  the front page features five items: a photo of the Avengers2 film shoot, with Captain America posed on the set; four stories with these headlines:   Japan adopts absurd claims in textbooks ; Obama plays favorites ; Ortiz’s selfie makes White House uneasy ; and ‘US knows japan at fault on row with Korea’ … all about America and Japan!  (Obama is said to be favoring Japan -- he even supposedly pressed the Virginia governor to veto the bill requiring Virginia textbooks to add the name “East Sea” to Sea of Japan!). And the Avengers2 filmshoot dominates public talk -- students and teachers alike discuss sightings of the film crew or actors, and the resulting traffic delays at the bridges in use. But it is considered worth the effort, to show the world that Korea is a hip, modern place, worth the effort for Captain America to defend against the villains (from the north, perhaps?).