Skip to main content

a calm and sane atmosphere. Not.

What the presence of those forces means is that dialogue can now take place in a calm and sane atmosphere.
 (final sentence of editorial in ArabNews)
Cognitive dissonance:  foreign troops arrive during demonstrations; own police kill unarmed demonstrators; and a calm and sane atmosphere?
Bahrain is now occupied by Saudi troops and UAE police.  Although they are not directly involved in killing Bahraini citizens, they are a clear sign of the weakness of Bahrain's Khalifa royal family compared to the Sa'uds.  The move was not even staged as an invitation -- rather, the troops simply moved, and Bahrain's foreign minister tweeted the move as a fact. 
BBC HardTalk presented a fairly illustrative talk today countering spokesmen for the Bahrain ruling council and the exiled opposition.  The pro-government politician/businessman simply repeated his talking-point: we don't want to kill people, we just want stability and security (to which any objective viewer responds -- that's easy for him to say, as he has all the guns and money).   The opposition politician finessed his earlier inflammatory rhetoric, and pointed out the peacefulness of the demonstrations and readily maintained the moral high ground.  
This correspondent notes a couple of points that seem to be much more pertinent than many U.S. onlookers realize: 1- in both Saudi and Sharia traditions, brutal physical force is an expected and legitimate part of life; and 2- the rulers and most people on this side of the Gulf are Very Afraid of Persia.  (After all, whose Gulf is it, anyway?)  They are inclined to see an Irani hand in every Shi'ite neighborhood, fomenting rebellion against the natural order of benevolent (Sunni) rulers.    Note that the Saudi foreign minister recently stated he would “cut any finger that crosses into the kingdom.”
ArabNews also notes approvingly that the US cited “..another example of Iran’s destabilizing activities in the region.” (ironically that supported Israel's claims of Iranian arms smuggling to Gaza -- maybe the enemy of my enemy is starting to be my friend?  No, Arab News is sure to include at least one negative article every day about Israel, thus maintaining its anti-Zionist bona fides.)

But back to Bahrain -- our weekend jaunts to drink a Guinness, watch a movie, eat a full breakfast?  They will return, but will be tinged with guilt over the price paid by hundreds, thousands of protestors squashed by intolerant and brutal regimes.   On the BBC interview, the Bahraini businessman referred several times to the need to protect expatriates and keep them from fleeing the country -- I fear that this brutal crackdown simply puts a lid on a pot of boiling aspirations.   We wonder what will happen next, and pray for calmer counsel to prevail.

A separate note, about a good new source of information: the Crossroads Arabia blog has insightful commentary from a US perspective.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fleeing Trump, Americans go to Portugal

  Fleeing Trump, Americans go into exile in Portugal. “I'm afraid to go back” Not only minorities feel threatened by the Trump administration. Three couples, a mother and an academic tell us why they chose to live in Portugal. Some say: the American dream is over.      The above is today's headline article in our favorite trusted newspaper in Portugal, O Publico .  It's a centrist newspaper, owned by a big supermarket corporation.  Let's combine this with the recent news that Portugal's Air Force is now shifting away from its planned purchase of F-35 jets.  Even though Trump has not even mentioned Portugal in his various diatribes against former allies, Portugal and the rest of Europe are reeling from the attacks.  We hope it has the ironic effect of freeing Europe from American dominance and improving the chances for centrist leadership (against Trump-like parties that have been gaining prominence).  The original text follows: Em fuga de Tru...

EUA: tanto estrago em tão pouco tempo

 As part of my effort to learn about Portugal, both the country and the language, I'm subscribing to the centrist newspaper, O Publico .  There are plenty of newspapers: conservative tabloids, and socialist and communist-sponsored daily papers; I find O Publico to be most sober, with consistently interesting columnists and opinion pieces, in addition to some local (Porto) news, with just enough sporting news to keep me chatting with the taxi driver.   Today's opinion piece sums up, I think, European pundits' view of the U.S. government.  As the title puts it: so much damage in so little time.  I shudder at the rank incompetence and corrupt behavior, demonstrating a cynical attitude toward public service, showing indeed that the cruelty is the point. What scandal, what damage will be the tipping point to collapse this government?   And what will it take to recover from the damage?  Who will be able to trust the US government again, ever?   Only ni...

Captain America dominates the news, in many ways

KoreaTimes newspaper of April 5, 2014:  the front page features five items: a photo of the Avengers2 film shoot, with Captain America posed on the set; four stories with these headlines:   Japan adopts absurd claims in textbooks ; Obama plays favorites ; Ortiz’s selfie makes White House uneasy ; and ‘US knows japan at fault on row with Korea’ … all about America and Japan!  (Obama is said to be favoring Japan -- he even supposedly pressed the Virginia governor to veto the bill requiring Virginia textbooks to add the name “East Sea” to Sea of Japan!). And the Avengers2 filmshoot dominates public talk -- students and teachers alike discuss sightings of the film crew or actors, and the resulting traffic delays at the bridges in use. But it is considered worth the effort, to show the world that Korea is a hip, modern place, worth the effort for Captain America to defend against the villains (from the north, perhaps?).